|
A EUROPEAN CITY
Today's Dublin is the capital of a modern European member state. The prosperity
of the Irish economy in the 1990s has reflected itself in the revival
of the centre of the nation's capital. Having been traditionally a services
and administrative centre, Dublin is now the focus of a high-tech post-industrial
economy. The development of financial services, computer technology and
communications together with a scheme of tax incentives directed towards
urban renewal have been prime factors in the metamorphosis of the inner
city area.
Dublin was fortunate to miss out on the radical changes which occurred
to the urban fabric of most European cities both as a result of the Second
World War and the modernist aftermath when renewal was equated with removal.
The fabric of the city centre remained intact throughout the economic
boom of the 1960s despite the blight caused by road widening plans and
the changes brought about by generally mediocre office development.
By the time renewal of the city centre had commenced in the early 1990s
there had been a general reaction in Europe against modernist architecture
and urban planning that failed to take account of urban grain and context.
New methods of urban intervention as exemplified by the principles of
"Critical Reconstruction" established as part of the International
Building Exhibition in Berlin and the work of Martorell Bohigas Mackey
in the Nueva Icaria project in Barcelona, together with the philosophies
exposed by Leon Krier and Aldo Rossi, had taken root with Irish designers.
In general the guiding principle of the "European City" with
its strict division between public streets, squares and parks on the one
hand and private lots on the other was now in the ascendancy.
The title of "metropolis" can be genuinely claimed only by those
cities which respect their historical context. For this reason, it is
not the aim of urban design to collect outstanding architectural achievements
as in a museum. New architecture must relate to the city, to the historical
and urban planning context and to architectural tradition, in order to
reinforce the identity of the city. Architectural progress evolves from
the continued development of tradition, typologies and technologies. Recent
renewal work in Dublin has been generally faithful to the principles.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The change from the dear old decaying "Dirty Dublin" to the
fashionable capital of one of the European Union's economic success stories
has been both rapid and remarkable. The early redevelopment of the city
centred on the construction of a large number of apartment developments
on derelict sites and on the initial development of the International
Financial Services Sector.
Dublin Corporation with the arrival of a new City Manger and City Architect
and changes in significant staff experienced an administrative revival
in the period post 1995. Appropriate urban renewal schemes were planned
in areas such as Smithfield. More recently the Integrated Area Plans for
O'Connell Street, the North East Inner City, the Coombe and the Harp Area
each present the possibility of urban renewal achieving both physical
and social improvements.
The second phase of the IFSC is now well advanced and illustrates the
improvement in urban design over the earlier phase with a greater variety
of uses evident, particularly on Mayor Street.
The West End, i.e. the area between Parliament Street and Fishamble Street,
is the final stage of the Temple Bar Properties development involving
the major residential element of its building programme. This ambitious
programme involving a wide range of residential building types over retail
and restaurants, carried out by a team of seven architectural firms is
an urban renewal model of European significance.
The Smithfield area, one of the major public spaces in the Harp Area,
is in the process of being renewed with new tourism, leisure, commercial
and other mixed uses. It is set to reach its potential as a major public
space in North Inner City.
THE NEW MILLENNIUM
As we enter the twenty first century in an era of unprecedented economic
growth and with Dublin evolving and developing at an ever-increasing rate,
it is an appropriate time to reflect on what has been achieved in recent
years and on future direction.
Over 200 years ago, when the city last reached a comparable level of economic
prosperity, its image as a Georgian city of urban squares and terraces
punctuated by public buildings and spaces was established. The effect
of the Act of Union was not immediately apparent and the slow economic
decline and concomitant affect on the city's fabric was no longer apparent.
Notwithstanding the optimism of forecasters it is inevitable that this
period of economic advancement will moderate. Then future generations
will have an opportunity to reflect on the achievements of our generation.
As we enter the new millennium it is important that all of those involved
in shaping our city: architects; urban designers; planners; administrators
and politicians maintain the vision and objectives of Dublin as a model
European City in its urban design, architecture and quality of life.
Tony Reddy is a principle of Anthony Reddy Associates, Architects,
Planning Consultants, Urban Designers and Project Managers.
|
|
|